Please clarify whether I have understood correctly: He who is established in the SELF (Consciousness), such a person is not a doer though acting through Body, Mind & the Senses because being established in the Consciousness makes him a non doer, even though acting. However even when not acting trough the body , mind & senses such a person established in the Consciousness, sees himself as acting through the Upadhi of his Consciousness the Maya. I also understand what Swami has said when he says that that such a person (established in the SELF) can see that HE WHO SAYS I AM NOT ACTING is actually a DOER, because that person has arrogated to himself the doership even though he is not acting, as such a person sees the "I" when he says I am not acting, and hence acts.
Question : Does this sloka 4 (18) refer to seeing action in inaction and inaction in action to the same person or the frame shifts from seeing inaction in himself while established in the Self and action in the other who claims to be non acting. Ideally the frame of reference should not shift and the sloka must refer to the same person who is seeing both action and inaction in himself while established in the Self.